Inside3D!
     

Skeletal animation stuff (Darkplaces / FTE type specific)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Inside3d Forums Forum Index -> QuakeC Programming
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chris



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:07 am    Post subject: Skeletal animation stuff (Darkplaces / FTE type specific) Reply with quote

So was thinking since in essence DP and FTE support skeletal meshes (dpm in example) if there is a way to read the bone hierarchy and make certain bones above or below this point perform an animation or rotation seperate from that of the rest of the model.

e.g. player's lower body playing run animation while upper body is reloading.

I feel tagging multiple models to make up players has really shown it's age and basic skeletal control would add so much more flexibility. Is there any reason this hasn't been addressed over the years I'm sure it has been brought up? Is there some technical limitation inherent in these newer Quake based engines that just make it impossible?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
jim



Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 400
Location: In The Sun

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tried it sevaral months/year ago, but it didn't go anywhere. It either crashed, didn't do anything or was constantly glitching between the two animations it was meant to play on different parts.

Here was the discussion about the dpm models: http://forums.inside3d.com/viewtopic.php?t=764

I tried doing what Preach suggested, but like I said.. I didn't get it work.
_________________
zbang!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Spike



Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 944
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So I was having a look at halflife models recently...
My god.

In order to animate a halflife model properly there are multiple things to change.

Firstly there are the bone controllers. These are programmable bone configuration values that move or rotate given bones as defined by the model. In the player model case, all four affect the spine. They also only twist about 90 degrees from forwards.

The mouth controller is not used on players. I don't know why they made it a separate feature. Personally I consider it just a fifth controller.

Secondly there are actually two animations for each shooting animation. One looking up, one looking down. The pitch of the player is chosen by blending between these two subsequences.
I guess it works better for gradual curvature of the spine...

Thirdly there is the movement animation. That is, a separate animation which is applied to the lower body (anything below a specific named bone as far as I can tell). Which basically replaces the animation. Which is what Chris refers to.

What also needs mentioning is that each animation is indeed an animation, rather than descrete frames. Thus there is additional blending to go from one to the next.

And of course, if a model changes animations it needs to blend from one sequence to annother.

Its also worth noting that there is no 'run backwards' animation.
Instead the run forwards animation is meant to be played backwards.

This means you need about 17 different values in order to animate a single halflife player model. That's going to need csqc.

So while we could have a base animation affecting the skeleton up to the pelvis, and a normal animation applying to anything above this, you still lack pitch/yaw control with the zym/dpm model formats.

Conclusion:
Adding in a base/lower animation adds in 6 more fields to csqc, and could be interpolated based on 2 fields from a server (frame number and ending bone and let the engine interpolate).
It still doesn't give the full range of control expected in modern games however.
_________________
What's a signature?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
leileilol



Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 1321

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spike wrote:
The mouth controller is not used on players.

It is. Suit sentences play on player's mouth if available.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Spike you're going overboard into wishlist territory and not even considering implementing a bare bones "play 2 independent animations on one model" kind of thing. Not asking for lerping between looking up and down to determine blending there, simply top body doing one animation bottom doing another. Proper implementation sure would entail a lot of that. But there is literally no support for multiple animations on one model which by even 2000's was quickly becoming an adopted standard for any kind of quality looking game like the ones these engines would be used for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Spike



Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 944
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wish lists includes ragdoll.

A game that does not support variable leg directions or torso twisting will take flak from it. I don't see this as unreasonable, but I don't see a nice clean way to implement it into gamecode. A legs animation could be implemented in DP/FTE with relative ease without changing the zym/dpm formats.
It would of course require engine, gamecode, and model changes, and only a team of people can really see that through, which tbh is the main reason we don't have anything like it yet.

Incidentily I did already plan on implementing baseframe/baseframe2/baselerpfrac/baseframe1time/baseframe2time/basebone into fte and controlable via csqc.
I could add support for baseframe/basebone in server-side qc but I'm not sure if that would be as practical. And networking/interpolation are a pain. And I'm lazy.

I just fear that its not enough as this mechanism alone can't match such 'classic' games as halflife.
_________________
What's a signature?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chris



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree it couldn't match HL1's entire feature set for animations but it would be a great addition and really add a powerful useful tool for developers using these engines.

You mentioned that you could be able to pull off a bare bones implementation using the current formats, but require a team for testing I suppose? I'd be willing to do this for you if you like.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Spike



Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 944
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EXT_CSQC_BASEFRAME is now supported in FTE.
This extension replaces the earlier bones of skeletal model formats (zym/dpm) with an alternate animation.
Bones before the 'basebone' field's value (use gettagindex) will use the 'base' frames, while bones after will use the regular frames. A value of 0 in basebone uses purely the regular frames.

This means that if your model starts with the hips and legs then has the chest, you can set the base bone to the chest bone, use the base frames to animate the run/standing sequences, and the regular frames to animate the shooting sequences.

This extension currently _requires_ csqc.

I also only just committed it. I may also have gotten the base bone index off by one.
_________________
What's a signature?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Electro



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 241
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

about time the skeletal animation stuff got some love!

Have been needing animation blending, bone control in qc and some other seeming simple things to do nice looking animations. It's not like there isn't already far more complex features in FTE and DP already! I can't wait to do some animations in them if the animation systems are brought up to scratch with something at least of HL1 quality.
_________________
Unit reporting!
http://www.bendarling.net/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Urre



Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 1073
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surprised
_________________
Look out for Twigboy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chris



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

any hope for this feature to be put into darkplaces or extended to support blending based on the pitch of a character so they can bend up and down ? Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Inside3d Forums Forum Index -> QuakeC Programming All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2004 phpBB Group