Comments on: Hooray, submitting is so easy now http://www.quaddicted.com/descriptions/hooray-submitting-is-so-easy-now/ The greatest Quake 1 Singleplayer site on this planet. Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:15:18 +0000 hourly 1 By: neg|ke http://www.quaddicted.com/descriptions/hooray-submitting-is-so-easy-now/comment-page-1/#comment-45 neg|ke Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:21:04 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=25#comment-45 Yeah, careful with "crap". It's a thin line between "poor" and "crap" sometimes, but I think the latter rating should only apply if the map is really bad in several aspects - in a big-box-with-200-shamblers-kind of way. I usually try to be a bit more forgiving if the map shows promise and follows some (any) recognizable theme. Most 1996-98 maps are just average at best, however some are quite nice even if they don't match today's (or let's say 2000+) standards. Yeah, careful with “crap”. It’s a thin line between “poor” and “crap” sometimes, but I think the latter rating should only apply if the map is really bad in several aspects – in a big-box-with-200-shamblers-kind of way.

I usually try to be a bit more forgiving if the map shows promise and follows some (any) recognizable theme. Most 1996-98 maps are just average at best, however some are quite nice even if they don’t match today’s (or let’s say 2000+) standards.

]]>
By: Spirit http://www.quaddicted.com/descriptions/hooray-submitting-is-so-easy-now/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Spirit Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:36:50 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=25#comment-44 "It will be save in a queue folder waiting to be added. I will try to update the site as often as possible, at least weekly." ;) “It will be save in a queue folder waiting to be added. I will try to update the site as often as possible, at least weekly.” ;)

]]>
By: sielwolf http://www.quaddicted.com/descriptions/hooray-submitting-is-so-easy-now/comment-page-1/#comment-43 sielwolf Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:34:59 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=25#comment-43 "Sure, just go ahead and submit a new one." I did, but I still see the old description ?! “Sure, just go ahead and submit a new one.”

I did, but I still see the old description ?!

]]>
By: Spirit http://www.quaddicted.com/descriptions/hooray-submitting-is-so-easy-now/comment-page-1/#comment-42 Spirit Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:11:42 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=25#comment-42 Sure, just go ahead and submit a new one. :) (You are right, Crap is too low for it. I'm such a bitter person these days. :\ ) In discussion with Madfox I noticed that the descriptions are very subjective indeed. I'll try to change that a bit. It's hard to please when it's up to my choice how I do it and there is basically no feedback. Sure, just go ahead and submit a new one. :)
(You are right, Crap is too low for it. I’m such a bitter person these days. :\ )

In discussion with Madfox I noticed that the descriptions are very subjective indeed. I’ll try to change that a bit. It’s hard to please when it’s up to my choice how I do it and there is basically no feedback.

]]>
By: sielwolf http://www.quaddicted.com/descriptions/hooray-submitting-is-so-easy-now/comment-page-1/#comment-41 sielwolf Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:42:07 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=25#comment-41 Great work by Sajt, and good to read some new reviews. One point: as MadFox mentioned on Func_ maybe you´re being a little bit too subjective, rating the maps more regarding built quality and detail. For example Shoradar: rated "crap", IMO it´s an ok oldskool map, not very good looking and sure annoying, but very challenging to play; I like that. It´d be nice to have 2nd opinions on the reviews rather than editing the ones already there. Great work by Sajt, and good to read some new reviews.

One point: as MadFox mentioned on Func_ maybe you´re being a little bit too subjective, rating the maps more regarding built quality and detail.

For example Shoradar: rated “crap”, IMO it´s an ok oldskool map, not very good looking and sure annoying, but very challenging to play; I like that.

It´d be nice to have 2nd opinions on the reviews rather than editing the ones already there.

]]>