Carmack comments on C++ coding style(!) on Kotaku.com
Moderator: InsideQC Admins
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Carmack comments on C++ coding style(!) on Kotaku.com
by frag.machine » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:48 pm
I know FrikaC made a cgi-bin version of the quakec interpreter once and wrote part of his website in QuakeC 
(LordHavoc)
(LordHavoc)-
frag.machine - Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:49 pm
Re: Carmack comments on C++ coding style(!) on Kotaku.com
by revelator » Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:57 pm
Interresting read thanks frag
Productivity is a state of mind.
-
revelator - Posts: 2605
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:04 pm
- Location: inside tha debugger
Re: Carmack comments on C++ coding style(!) on Kotaku.com
by leileilol » Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:42 pm
Kotaku....... should I expect a reply tree of "cam rack u sold out to consoles rage suck's"?
- leileilol
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:23 am
Re: Carmack comments on C++ coding style(!) on Kotaku.com
by frag.machine » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:44 pm
Actually, no. To my own surprise (hence the "(!)" in the subject), a lot of programmers replies, some obviously doubting about a real Carmack post. But when I read him talking about functional programming I knew it was The One (tm).
I know FrikaC made a cgi-bin version of the quakec interpreter once and wrote part of his website in QuakeC (LordHavoc)
(LordHavoc)-
frag.machine - Posts: 2120
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:49 pm
Re: Carmack comments on C++ coding style(!) on Kotaku.com
by qbism » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:59 pm
Can always get some of that "thx for killing the doom series" on gameinformer.
-
qbism - Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:51 am
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest