by scar3crow » Fri Aug 02, 2013 3:12 pm
Didn't get to watch much of it, nor do I know off the top of my head where to find it, but during Carmack's keynote speech he spoke of how he had been wondering how it would've been had instead of making QuakeC, he made QuakeScheme. It was an interesting little side note, and then he went off on a tangent about mucking around in Haskell. Something to discuss, how do you think Quake would've gone had its interpreted language been based on Scheme rather than C?
...and all around me was the chaos of battle and the reek of running blood.... and for the first time in my life I knew true happiness.