Lower resolutions should generate a lower number of count cycles in comparison to spancount cycles. Is it also slower at higher resolutions?
And on a side note, that stippled version I've posted above is broken at the remainder ( if (spancount > 0) ) part.
Drawspans optimization in C for software Quake
Moderator: InsideQC Admins
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Drawspans optimization in C for software Quake
by mankrip » Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:26 am
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh mankrip Hell's end wgah'nagl fhtagn.
==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==
/ /
==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==
/ /
-
mankrip - Posts: 915
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Drawspans optimization in C for software Quake
by mankrip » Fri May 01, 2015 7:11 pm
Negative indexes are really bad for stippling and for dithering, because they screw up bit parity consistency (*pdest&1).
My current code uses positive indexes for everything.
My current code uses positive indexes for everything.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh mankrip Hell's end wgah'nagl fhtagn.
==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==
/ /
==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==
/ /
-
mankrip - Posts: 915
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:02 am
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to Programming Tutorials
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest