by leileilol » Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:34 am
I've tested the mk+mh spans with a release build on Pentium II, and they're actually slower than the Qbism/mh span16 up here. I keep getting 40.2/40.6 with the mk/mh version with timedemo demo1 compared to the qbism version which had 41.2.
Can't say if the optimizations are beneficial for the dreamcast, since that's an overrated piece of hitachi-powered crap