Comments on: Tronyn reviews: Red Slammer by negke http://www.quaddicted.com/tronyn-reviews/tronyn-reviews-red-slammer-by-negke/ The greatest Quake 1 Singleplayer site on this planet. Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:15:18 +0000 hourly 1 By: Trinca http://www.quaddicted.com/tronyn-reviews/tronyn-reviews-red-slammer-by-negke/comment-page-1/#comment-2630 Trinca Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:15:07 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=1237#comment-2630 Tronyn STFU and keep writing... at least we can complain about something... better then nothing ;) Tronyn STFU and keep writing… at least we can complain about something… better then nothing ;)

]]>
By: Tronyn http://www.quaddicted.com/tronyn-reviews/tronyn-reviews-red-slammer-by-negke/comment-page-1/#comment-2629 Tronyn Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:13:44 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=1237#comment-2629 I was proud to have a review ready within a couple days, amusingly pre-empting the Quaddicted news post (no offense Spirit, this is just me self-congratulating on review speed, though we all know I've taken months to review maps at times). I thought this latest batch of (two) reviews brought up a lot of issues: first, I gave Lower Forecourt 17, whereas now I think I should have given it 18 or 19, since I think it's better than Red Slammer, which itself clearly deserves 17 at least. That, along with negke's own comment about 'layout master vs detail whore' on func_, made me think all over again about different orientations and goals in mapping; maybe the Quaddicted system is better than a number out of 20; at least the number should be understood as a limited representation of my view of what I thought when I played the map once or twice. I was proud to have a review ready within a couple days, amusingly pre-empting the Quaddicted news post (no offense Spirit, this is just me self-congratulating on review speed, though we all know I’ve taken months to review maps at times). I thought this latest batch of (two) reviews brought up a lot of issues: first, I gave Lower Forecourt 17, whereas now I think I should have given it 18 or 19, since I think it’s better than Red Slammer, which itself clearly deserves 17 at least. That, along with negke’s own comment about ‘layout master vs detail whore’ on func_, made me think all over again about different orientations and goals in mapping; maybe the Quaddicted system is better than a number out of 20; at least the number should be understood as a limited representation of my view of what I thought when I played the map once or twice.

]]>
By: negke http://www.quaddicted.com/tronyn-reviews/tronyn-reviews-red-slammer-by-negke/comment-page-1/#comment-2626 negke Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:20:48 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=1237#comment-2626 It's fine. Though maybe next time just the post news items soon after the releases to get it over with... before the short-time memory buffer overflows. ;) It’s fine. Though maybe next time just the post news items soon after the releases to get it over with… before the short-time memory buffer overflows. ;)

]]>
By: Spirit http://www.quaddicted.com/tronyn-reviews/tronyn-reviews-red-slammer-by-negke/comment-page-1/#comment-2624 Spirit Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:55:45 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=1237#comment-2624 That's because I completely forgot to post news about this map. I need a time machine. That’s because I completely forgot to post news about this map. I need a time machine.

]]>
By: negke http://www.quaddicted.com/tronyn-reviews/tronyn-reviews-red-slammer-by-negke/comment-page-1/#comment-2621 negke Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:44:02 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=1237#comment-2621 Btw. the download link above doesn't work, either. Here is the file: http://negke.quaddicted.com/files/mappi.zip Btw. the download link above doesn’t work, either.
Here is the file: http://negke.quaddicted.com/files/mappi.zip

]]>
By: negke http://www.quaddicted.com/tronyn-reviews/tronyn-reviews-red-slammer-by-negke/comment-page-1/#comment-2619 negke Sun, 05 Sep 2010 07:37:58 +0000 http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=1237#comment-2619 Thanks for the review, Tronyn. Thanks for the review, Tronyn.

]]>